Factores de riesgo de muerte hospitalaria en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 / Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 outbreak

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: A pesar de los avances en el tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), este sigue presentando un pronóstico desfavorable. Hay poca evidencia acerca de la evolución de los pacientes con IAM y la enfermedad coronavírica de 2019 (COVID-19). El objetivo del estudio es describir la presentación clínica, las complicaciones y los factores predictores de mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes con IAM durante el brote de COVID-19 en España. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes, prospectivo y multicéntrico de todos los pacientes consecutivos con IAM en tratamiento invasivo durante el brote de COVID19 (15 de marzo a 15 de abril de 2020). Se compararon las características clínicas de los pacientes positivos para COVID-19 con las de los negativos, y se evaluó el efecto de la COVID-19 en la mortalidad mediante emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión y regresión logística. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 187 pacientes con IAM: 111 con elevación del segmento ST y 76 sin elevación. De ellos, 32 (17%) resultaron positivos para COVID-19. Las puntuaciones GRACE y Killip-Kimball y varios marcadores inflamatorios resultaron significativamente mayores en los pacientes con COVID-19. La mortalidad total y cardiovascular fueron significativamente mayores en los pacientes con COVID-19 (el 25 frente al 3,8%; p < 0,001; y el 15,2 frente al 1,8%; p = 0,001). La puntuación GRACE > 140 (OR = 23,45; IC95%, 2,52-62,51; p = 0,005) y la COVID-19 (OR = 6,61; IC95%, 1,82-24,43; p = 0,02) resultaron factores independientes de mortalidad hospitalaria. CONCLUSIONES: Durante el brote epidémico, la puntuación GRACE elevada y la COVID19 fueron los factores independientes de mortalidad hospitalaria en los pacientes con IAM

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in treatment, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still exhibit unfavorable short- and long-term prognoses. In addition, there is scant evidence about the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation, complications, and risk factors for mortality in patients admitted for AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, cohort study included all consecutive patients with AMI who underwent coronary angiography in a 30-day period corresponding chronologically with the COVID-19 outbreak (March 15 to April 15, 2020). Clinical presentations and outcomes were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The effect of COVID-19 on mortality was assessed by propensity score matching and with a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: In total, 187 patients were admitted for AMI, 111 with ST-segment elevation AMI and 76 with non-ST-segment elevation AMI. Of these, 32 (17%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. GRACE score, Killip-Kimball classification, and several inflammatory markers were significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients. Total and cardiovascular mortality were also significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients (25% vs 3.8% [P < .001] and 15.2% vs 1.8% [P = .001], respectively). GRACE score > 140 (OR, 23.45; 95%CI, 2.52-62.51; P = .005) and COVID-19 (OR, 6.61; 95%CI, 1.82-24.43; P = .02) were independent predictors of in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: During this pandemic, a high GRACE score and COVID-19 were independent risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality

[Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 outbreak]. / Factores de riesgo de muerte hospitalaria en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio durante la pandemia de la COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in treatment, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still exhibit unfavorable short- and long-term prognoses. In addition, there is scant evidence about the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation, complications, and risk factors for mortality in patients admitted for AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, cohort study included all consecutive patients with AMI who underwent coronary angiography in a 30-day period corresponding chronologically with the COVID-19 outbreak (March 15 to April 15, 2020). Clinical presentations and outcomes were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The effect of COVID-19 on mortality was assessed by propensity score matching and with a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: In total, 187 patients were admitted for AMI, 111 with ST-segment elevation AMI and 76 with non-ST-segment elevation AMI. Of these, 32 (17%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. GRACE score, Killip-Kimball classification, and several inflammatory markers were significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients. Total and cardiovascular mortality were also significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients (25% vs 3.8% [P < .001] and 15.2% vs 1.8% [P = .001], respectively). GRACE score > 140 (OR, 23.45; 95%CI, 2.52-62.51; P = .005) and COVID-19 (OR, 6.61; 95%CI, 1.82-24.43; P = .02) were independent predictors of in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: During this pandemic, a high GRACE score and COVID-19 were independent risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en.

Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 outbreak.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in treatment, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still exhibit unfavorable short- and long-term prognoses. In addition, there is scant evidence about the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation, complications, and risk factors for mortality in patients admitted for AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, cohort study included all consecutive patients with AMI who underwent coronary angiography in a 30-day period corresponding chronologically with the COVID-19 outbreak (March 15 to April 15, 2020). Clinical presentations and outcomes were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The effect of COVID-19 on mortality was assessed by propensity score matching and with a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: In total, 187 patients were admitted for AMI, 111 with ST-segment elevation AMI and 76 with non-ST-segment elevation AMI. Of these, 32 (17%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. GRACE score, Killip-Kimball classification, and several inflammatory markers were significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients. Total and cardiovascular mortality were also significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients (25% vs 3.8% [P <.001] and 15.2% vs 1.8% [P=.001], respectively). GRACE score> 140 (OR, 23.45; 95%CI, 2.52-62.51; P=.005) and COVID-19 (OR, 6.61; 95%CI, 1.82-24.43; P=.02) were independent predictors of in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: During this pandemic, a high GRACE score and COVID-19 were independent risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Ivabradina para el control crónico de la frecuencia cardiaca en fibrilación auricular permanente. Diseño del proyecto BRAKE-AF / Ivabradine for chronic heart rate control in persistent atrial fibrillation. Design of the BRAKE-AF project

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La ivabradina es un inhibidor de la corriente If, principal determinante de la función marcapasos del nódulo sinusal, aprobado como antianginoso y para tratar la insuficiencia cardiaca. Existen indicios sobre su capacidad para inhibir la conducción a través del nódulo auriculoventricular (NAV). Sobre esta base, el proyecto BRAKE-AF plantea el uso de ivabradina como agente cronotrópico negativo en fibrilación auricular (FA). MÉTODOS: Se realizará un ensayo clínico multicéntrico de fase III, aleatorizado, abierto, en paralelo, con diseño de no inferioridad, para comparar la ivabradina frente a la digoxina en 232 pacientes con FA permanente no controlada con bloqueadores beta o antagonistas del calcio; el objetivo primario es la reducción de la frecuencia cardiaca media diurna en un Holter de 24 h a los 3 meses. El ensayo se apoyará en un estudio electrofisiológico que analizará el efecto de la ivabradina en el potencial de acción del NAV humano, utilizando un modelo experimental en células de ovario de hámster chino transfectadas con el ADN que codifica la expresión de los distintos canales que componen dicho potencial de acción, registrando las corrientes iónicas mediante la técnica del parche de membrana. RESULTADOS: Se obtendrá información tanto del efecto de la ivabradina en las corrientes iónicas y el potencial de acción del NAV como de su eficacia y su seguridad en pacientes con FA permanente. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados del proyecto BRAKE-AF podrían permitir que la ivabradina se incluyera en el limitado arsenal de fármacos disponibles actualmente para el control de frecuencia en la FA

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ivabradine is an inhibitor of the If channel, the main determinant of the pacemaker function of the sinus node. The drug has been approved for the treatment of angina and heart failure. There is some evidence of its role as an inhibitor of atrial-ventricular node (AVN) conduction. The aim of the BRAKE-AF project is to assess ivabradine use for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, parallel, open-label, noninferiority phase III clinical trial will be conducted to compare ivabradine vs digoxin in 232 patients with uncontrolled permanent AF despite beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers. The primary efficacy endpoint is the reduction in daytime heart rate measured by 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3 months. This clinical trial will be supported by an electrophysiological study of the effect of ivabradine on the action potential of the human AVN. To do this, an experimental model will be used with Chinese hamster ovarium cells transfected with the DNA encoding the expression of the t channels involved in this action potential and recording of the ionic currents with patch clamp techniques. RESULTS: New data will be obtained on the effect of ivabradine on the human AVN and its safety and efficacy in patients with permanent AF. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the BRAKE-AF project might allow inclusion of ivabradine within the limited arsenal of drugs currently available for rate control in AF

Infarto agudo de miocardio secundario a infección por Plasmodium ovale / Acute myocardial infarction secondary to infection by Plasmodium ovale

No disponible

Ivabradine for chronic heart rate control in persistent atrial fibrillation. Design of the BRAKE-AF project.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ivabradine is an inhibitor of the If channel, the main determinant of the pacemaker function of the sinus node. The drug has been approved for the treatment of angina and heart failure. There is some evidence of its role as an inhibitor of atrial-ventricular node (AVN) conduction. The aim of the BRAKE-AF project is to assess ivabradine use for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, parallel, open-label, noninferiority phase III clinical trial will be conducted to compare ivabradine vs digoxin in 232 patients with uncontrolled permanent AF despite beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers. The primary efficacy endpoint is the reduction in daytime heart rate measured by 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3 months. This clinical trial will be supported by an electrophysiological study of the effect of ivabradine on the action potential of the human AVN. To do this, an experimental model will be used with Chinese hamster ovarium cells transfected with the DNA encoding the expression of the t channels involved in this action potential and recording of the ionic currents with patch clamp techniques. RESULTS: New data will be obtained on the effect of ivabradine on the human AVN and its safety and efficacy in patients with permanent AF. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the BRAKE-AF project might allow inclusion of ivabradine within the limited arsenal of drugs currently available for rate control in AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03718273.

Endocarditis infecciosa en paciente con prótesis aórtica percutánea LOTUS / Infective endocarditis in a patient with a transcatheter LOTUS valve

No disponible

Electrocardiographic changes during induced therapeutic hypothermia in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest.

AIM: To assess the safety of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) concerning arrhythmias we analyzed serial electrocardiograms (ECG) during TH. METHODS: All patients recovered from a cardiac arrest with Glasgow < 9 at admission were treated with induced mild TH to 32-34 °C. TH was obtained with cool fluid infusion or a specific intravascular device. Twelve-lead ECG before, during, and after TH, as well as ECG telemetry data was recorded in all patients. From a total of 54 patients admitted with cardiac arrest during the study period, 47 patients had the 3 ECG and telemetry data available. ECG analysis was blinded and performed with manual caliper by two independent cardiologists from blinded copies of original ECG, recorded at 25 mm/s and 10 mm/mV. Coronary care unit staff analyzed ECG telemetry for rhythm disturbances. Variables measured in ECG were rhythm, RR, PR, QT and corrected QT (QTc by Bazett formula, measured in lead v2) intervals, QRS duration, presence of Osborn's J wave and U wave, as well as ST segment displacement and T wave amplitude in leads II, v2 and v5. RESULTS: Heart rate went down an average of 19 bpm during hypothermia and increased again 16 bpm with rewarming (P < 0.0005, both). There was a non-significant prolongation of the PR interval during TH and a significant decrease with rewarming (P = 0.041). QRS duration significantly prolonged (P = 0.041) with TH and shortened back (P < 0.005) with rewarming. QTc interval presented a mean prolongation of 58 ms (P < 0.005) during TH and a significant shortening with rewarming of 22.2 ms (P = 0.017). Osborn or J wave was found in 21.3% of the patients. New arrhythmias occurred in 38.3% of the patients. Most frequent arrhythmia was non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (19.1%), followed by severe bradycardia or paced rhythm (10.6%), accelerated nodal rhythm (8.5%) and atrial fibrillation (6.4%). No life threatening arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) occurred during TH. CONCLUSION: A 38.3% of patients had cardiac arrhythmias during TH but without life-threatening arrhythmias. A concern may rise when inducing TH to patients with long QT syndrome.

Computerized physician order entry in the cardiac intensive care unit: effects on prescription errors and workflow conditions.

PURPOSES: To evaluate the effects of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system in the cardiac intensive care unit by detecting prescription errors (PEs) and also to assess the impact on working conditions. METHODS: A longitudinal, prospective, before-after study was conducted during the periods before and after the implementation of the CPOE system. Clinical pharmacists were responsible for the registration, description and classification of PEs, and their causes and severity, according to an international taxonomy. Professionals were also surveyed for their opinion, concerns, and level of satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 470 treatment orders containing 5729 prescriptions were evaluated. The CPOE resulted in a marked reduction in the number of PEs: error rate was 44.8% (819 errors among 1829 prescriptions) with handwritten orders and 0.8% (16 among 2094 prescriptions) at the final electronic phase (P < .001). Lapses were the main cause of error in both prescription methods. Most errors did not reach the patients. Errors related with the computerized system were scarce. Most users were satisfied with many aspects of this technology, although a higher workload was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized physician order entry in the cardiac intensive care unit proved to be a safe and effective strategy in reducing PEs and was globally well received by professionals.

Obstructive sleep apnea and coronary artery disease: from pathophysiology to clinical implications.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are both complex and significant clinical problems. The pathophysiological mechanisms that link OSA with CAD are complex and can influence the broad spectrum of conditions caused by CAD, from subclinical atherosclerosis to myocardial infarction. OSA remains a significant clinical problem among patients with CAD, and evidence suggesting its role as a risk factor for CAD is growing. Furthermore, increasing data support that CAD prognosis may be influenced by OSA and its treatment by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. However, stronger evidence is needed to definitely answer these questions. This paper focuses on the relationship between OSA and CAD from the pathophysiological effects of OSA in CAD, to the clinical implications of OSA and its treatment in CAD patients.

Do patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Killip class I need intensive cardiac care after a successful primary percutaneous intervention?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited data regarding the need for intensive care or the appropriate length of hospital stay for patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). In order to optimize resources, we tried to determine the need of coronary care unit (CCU) admission for patients with STEMI who remained in Killip class I after a successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS: From August of 2006 till June of 2008, we analyzed data from all patients admitted in our CCU who met these criteria, a total of 278. We prospectively recorded all in-hospital adverse events and event-free survival at 30 and 90 days (all cause death, stroke, new acute coronary syndrome or re-hospitalization due to heart failure). Medical treatment was optimized according to the current guidelines. RESULTS: A coronary stent was implanted in 96% of the patients. None of the patients had any adverse event that could not be resolved in a step-down unit. Survival at 30 and at 90 days was 99.6% and 98.3% respectively. Event-free survival was 97.3% at 30 days and 94.3% at 90 days. The median length of stay was three days in the CCU and five days in the hospital. CONCLUSION: Patients with STEMI treated with PPCI who remained in Killip class I after the procedure and receive optimal pharmacological treatment have an excellent prognosis. All of them can probably be admitted safely to a step-down unit. Wide application of this management strategy may result in substantial cost savings.